Buscar este blog

domingo, 8 de enero de 2012

INFINITIVES AND GERUNDS. MAIN CASES. TRANSLATION EXERCISE

[I am sorry that this essay is partly in English and partly in Spanish, of course owing to the fact that it is a re-elaboration, at different times, of previous documents in my computer.

Infinitives and gerunds are certainly not always difficult, but this is a complex aspect of English grammar. It is not very hard to basically see what is ‘intermediate’ and what ‘advanced’ here. A good idea is always to concentrate on things that you do not know well, but are not quite unfamiliar to you, and be aware that the best policy is not always to study a whole document – that is, make your study personal: languages are complex and there is always more.]

Choosing between an infinite (with or without to) and a gerund (-ing-form) in English often poses a difficulty for foreigners; of course there are more important and/or basic and/or easy and/or systematic cases and others that are less so. We are going to deal  here with some major cases which usually pose problems. For others, like the use of infinitives after nouns, adjectives, indefinite pronouns and interrogative words, just look at these four examples; of course, you can always study aspects not included here in a good book or website.

I have no wish to change.
He was surprised to learn how much he’d spent.
I need someone to do this with.
Did you find out when to pay?

‘Similarly’ to Spanish, it is very common for one verb to be followed directly by another. Usually, the real problem is that choosing between Verb 1 + to-infinitive and Verb 1 + gerund (see points 4 and 7 below) is not clearly predictable at all, so this has to be worked on in every course, usually in a direct way too. Actually, there are not many cases of the second verb being a gerund in Spanish (Va contando siempre cuentos chinos is an example). Typical intermediate and advanced coursebooks include – at least – short lists of verbs followed by the one, the other, and both. Of course, good grammar and usage books certainly include these lists. But really memorising lists is not very practical, although you can always use them (or even better, a good – especially monolingual – dictionary) for reference when writing a composition. In this ‘difficult’ case, the difficulty will actually depend on such factors as your level of English, how common the main verb is, your linguistic intuition (I think, for example, that seeing the gerund as ‘more nominal’ than the infinitive usually helps) and whether it is or is not the same case as in Spanish. In my experience, the mistake is normally using an infinitive when the gerund is required; in this respect, the ‘gerund list’ is more interesting.

Gerunds and infinitives after verbs are also difficult because:

a)     There are other many other kinds of subordinate clauses in English, sometimes with a similar meaning (especially that-clauses). You have to say I enjoy playing cards and I hope to see you soon, but We all hoped that he would succeed, and see can be used with many kinds of subordinate clauses: I can see you’re upset / I don’t see why she had to do that / She saw me open her jewel box / She saw me playing with the children /

b)     Again, what has just been stated is similar in Spanish, but of course one verb may have that/que in one language and an infinitive or a gerund in the other. Languages cannot be predicted in this way. There are probably more ‘que’-clauses in Spanish - when there is a subjunctive after que, the typical English equivalent is with an infinitive (points 3b and 5 below).

In what follows, the first cases are some of those predictable cases in which the gerund is used - not after another verb.

[NOTE: For the important, specific use of the to-infinitive and other structures indicating purpose, see “Purpose: for + noun phrase, (in order) to + clause, etc.” in this blog.]


1) Gerund after a preposition

As a gerund is in English the verbal form which behaves like a noun, it is the only right option when a verb follows a preposition. The only problem is that the verbal form acting similarly to a noun in Spanish is the infinitive. This general statement could also be useful for some of the following points. The important thing would be for you to realise that we can use ‘nadar’ (even ‘el nadar’) meaning something like ‘la natación’, and that this is swimming in English. Well, this (which is a bit more complicated) is true for all verbs (except the modals, like can, which only have present and past forms). Some examples:

I’m thinking of going on holiday abroad.
What about seeing them now?
He walked away without looking back.
After drinking three glasses, she felt unwell.

The rule of course also applies to the preposition by; the curious problem here is that this can be used for expressing how something is done, and in this particular case Spanish does make use of the gerund … but without a preposition! So this is a typical students’ mistake … of a different kind. By here is similar to by means of.

We got the job finished by working sixteen hours a day.
‘Dejamos acabada la faena trabajando dieciséis horas al día.’ [‘mediante el trabajar’, so to say]

A less easy case in this point is that to happens to be an English preposition, not only the ‘mark of the infinitive’. So, there are some cases where you need to use the gerund after to. First, look at some typical cases:

         I’m not used to driving on the left.
         I prefer riding to walking.
         Do you object to working on Sundays?
I’m looking forward to seeing you at Christmas.

If you are not sure whether to (before a verb) is a preposition or not, try putting a noun after it. If you can, it is a preposition (and is followed by the –ing-form):

         I’m not used to British traffic conditions.
         I prefer coffee to tea.
         Do you object to Sunday work?
I’m looking forward to Christmas.

In any case, the probability for a gerund to follow to is low, as compared to to + base form!


2) Gerunds and infinitives as the subject of a sentence

In older English, an infinitive subject could easily be put at the beginning of a sentence, like any other subject:
        
         To err is human, to forgive divine.

In modern English, it is much more common to begin the sentence with the ‘preparatory’ subject it, and to put the infinitive later:

         It’s easy to make mistakes. (Instead of To make mistakes is easy.)
It was impossible to explain what I meant. (Instead of To explain what I meant was impossible.)

But it is also extremely common to directly use a gerund in this case, particularly when talking about an activity in general:

         Selling insurance is a pretty boring job.

But if we are talking about one particular action, the infinitive structure is more usual:
        
It was difficult to sell insurance in those days.

But it is not really a ‘mistake’ if you use the other option in either case above:

         It is a pretty boring job to sell insurance.
         Selling insurance in those days was difficult.

Also, the gerund seems to be preferred with a short, simple subject (e.g. only the gerund, with no object), and the anticipatory-it construction + infinitive with longer subjects:

SWIMMING (IS) NOT ALLOWED
It is forbidden to swim in the whole area in winter.


3) Infinitivo sin to (= forma base del verbo)

Aparte de los verbos modales “puros” (can, could, may, might, will, would, shall, should, must) y algunos modales secundarios como needn’t y dare, llevan esta estructura, pero con el objeto del primer verbo antes del infinitivo:

a) Verbos de percepción como see, notice, watch, hear, listen to, feel. Estos verbos también pueden ir seguidos de gerundio, como verás, aunque el significado difiere.

          I always see her go to school.  ‘Siempre la veo ir a la escuela.’
          We heard him speak to the children. Le oímos hablar con los niños.’

b) Los verbos comunes make y let:

         Don’t make me laugh.
‘No me hagas reír.’ / ‘No hagas que me ría.’

         My  parents let me go out at night
‘Mis padres me dejan que salga (= me dejan salir) de noche.’


4) Verbo 1 + infinitivo con to

We hope to see you soon
‘Esperamos verte pronto.’

They seem to have a lot of money.
‘Parecen tener (= Parece que tienen) mucho dinero.’

According to Michael Swan, the following are the most common verbs which are followed directly by the to-infinitive. I have made some ‘subjective’ grouping for you so that ‘some memorisation’ may be easier:

want
intend
mean
expect
hope
wish
……..
ask
beg
offer
promise
swear
propose
choose
decide
determine
…………
agree
consent
………
prepare
arrange
manage
attempt
try
fail
…….
learn
remember
forget
……….
prefer
would like
like
would love
love
hate
……….
begin
start
……..
appear
seem
happen
…………
(Miscellaneous group)
use [Past Simple only]
help
care
regret
bear
dare
hesitate
pretend
neglect
trouble
afford

Some of these verbs can also be followed by a gerund, often with a difference in meaning (see 9 and 10 below); and some can be also used in the construction verb + object + to-infinitive (point 5 below).


5) Verbo 1 +  objeto directo +  infinitivo con to

El objeto directo (grupo nominal, que puede estar desempeñado por un pronombre, naturalmente) lo es del primer verbo pero funciona como sujeto del infinitivo que le sigue. Esta estructura es básicamente la de let y make, pero con to, y afecta a muchos más verbos. Empecemos con (para los hispanoparlantes) el verbo más importante de este grupo, junto con el tell de ‘influencia’:

‘Quiero ir luego.’ - I want to go later.
‘Quiero que ella vaya luego’ - I want her to go later.

En el primer ejemplo, el sujeto de ir es el mismo que el del primer verbo, así que un infinitivo solo es suficiente, pero en el segundo el sujeto de ir es ella, así que se utiliza una cláusula de que con subjuntivo en español y un objeto ante el infinitivo en inglés, algo que también ocurre a veces en nuestra lengua como puedes comprobar también más abajo.

Así que el primer grupo es el de want y similares:

want
need
(would) like
(would) prefer
wish
hate
expect
intend
mean

Como verás en la restante lista, casi todos son verbos de este grupo son los de “influencia” (el estilo indirecto que procede de un imperativo, los verbos ‘causativos’ o de ‘obligar, forzar’, los coercitivos e ideas más o menos similares:

tell (decir)
advise (aconsejar)
recommend
warn (advertir)
ask (pedir)
request (pedir como favor)
beg (suplicar)
persuade (convencer, persuadir)
invite
order, command, instruct (mandar, ordenar)
get, compel, force, oblige, press [variedad de estilos y matices para indicar una ‘imposición’ a actuar]
encourage (animar a)
tempt (tentar)
allow, permit (permitir)
leave
forbid (prohibir)
cause (provocar)
teach
remind (recordar [a alguien que haga algo, pero no ‘rememorar, evocar’, que es remember o recall, por ejemplo])

He told them to be quiet.  
Les dijo que se quedaran callados.’

They advise us to be early.  
Nos aconsejan que no nos retrasemos. /... no retrasarnos.’

They allowed/permitted me to stay there.
Me permitieron quedarme (= que me quedara) allí.’

I´ll remind the students to do the paper.
Les voy a recordar a los estudiantes que hagan el trabajo.’

 I’d like you to come with me.  ‘
Me gustaría que vinieses conmigo.’

El “gran ausente” de la lista es suggest: *I suggested her to go home is incorrect. The correct structure (with at least two possible subjunctive forms) is I suggested that she (should) go home.

Help admite dos posibilidades: Please help me (to) find the map.


6) for + objeto  + infinitivo con to

Con expresiones impersonales que indican posibilidad, juicio de valor, necesidad, etc. tenemos que + subjuntivo en castellano, pero la construcción inglesa típica es  for + objeto  + infinitivo con to. (con el típico sujeto “anticipatorio”, vacío semánticamente, it).

‘Es imposible que aprueben.’ - It’s impossible for them to pass.
‘Es difícil que el equipo gane hoy.’ - It’s difficult for the team to win today.
‘Era mejor que nos quedáramos en casa.’ - It was better for us to stay at home.

Ciertos verbos preposicionales también tienen una construcción similar:

We are waiting for him to come.  ‘Estamos esperando a que venga.’
It depends on us to decide.   ‘Depende de nosotros decidir.’


7) Verbo 1  +  gerundio

This is the basic list. In this adaptation, I have split it into three parts: (a) is made up of verbs that typically take the gerund directly, while (b) consists of verbs that typically take an object or a possessive before the gerund, and the verbs in (c) are very common with either structure. Note, therefore, that the lists are not rigid or closed. Subjectively, I have tried to basically enlist the verbs in order of frequency.

a)

go (swimming/shopping/fishing/dancing and many others)
finish
give up
keep (on)
suggest
be worth
be no use
admit
deny
avoid
consider
feel like
can’t help
put off
postpone
delay
miss
practise
contemplate
face
risk
escape

He gave up drinking alcohol.  
‘Dejó de beber alcohol.’ / ‘Dejó la bebida.’

That film is worth watching
‘Esa película es digna de verse.’

The car isn’t worth repairing.(= It isn’t worth repairing the car.)
No merece la pena reparar el coche. ‘

It’s (=There’s) no use speaking to him
‘De nada vale hablar con él.’

b)

spend (time) (doing something)
appreciate
excuse
forgive
resent
understand

La diferencia entre el posesivo (John’s, his) y el objeto directo (John, him) es más bien de estilo/registro: el primero es más formal y más común en la escritura.

I really appreciate you/your waiting for me for so long.
Aprecio sinceramente que me haya(s) esperado tanto tiempo.’

Please excuse me/my being so late.  
Disculpad/Disculpen que llegue tan tarde.’

They will never forgive their son(‘) not visiting them.
‘Nunca le perdonarán a su hijo que no les visitara.’

c)

enjoy
mind
imagine
can’t stand
dislike
involve
mention
detest
(can’t) resist
endure

Do you mind staying here? 
‘¿Te importa quedarte aquí?’

Do you mind me/my making a suggestion?
‘¿Le importa si hago (=que haga) una sugerencia?’

I can’t stand having to get up at 6 every day.
No soporto tener que levantarme a las 6 todos los días.’

I can’t stand my husband getting up at 6 every day when there’s no point.
No puedo soportar que mi marido se levante a las 6 todos los días cuando no hace ninguna falta.’

An important special case is prevent someone (from) doing something [‘evitar que alguien haga algo’], or prevent something (from) happening [‘evitar que algo suceda’]. Besides, stop can replace prevent in an informal style:

The police prevented him from taking the money away.
‘La policía evitó que [él] se llevara el dinero.’

I stopped Jack following me by covering myself with a huge coat, a cap and dark glasses.
Evité que Jack me siguiera envolviéndome entero con (…)’


8) More about perception verbs

Los verbos estudiados en el punto 1-a pueden ir seguidos también de un gerundio, si es que estamos interesados en el aspecto progresivo de la acción. Si por contra estamos interesados en la acción como ya acabada, se usa la forma base del verbo.

Compara:

I saw him crossing the road. ‘Le vi cruzando (=mientras él la cruzaba) la calle.’
I saw him cross the road.   ‘Le vi cruzar la calle.’ [Vi toda la acción de cabo a rabo]

I heard them arriving.  ‘Les oí que llegaban / (que estaban) llegando.’
I hear them arrive‘Les oí llegar.’ (O sea: ‘Les oí que llegaron’.)


9) Verbo 1 más infinitivo con to o bien gerundio (indistintamente)

Algunos pocos verbos comunes pueden indistintamente tener la construcción del punto 4  o la del 7. En realidad, puede haber diferencias de matiz, de frecuencia, etc. Ejemplos comunes: begin, start, continue, intend (‘tener la intención de’), like, love (‘encantarle a uno’), prefer, hate (‘odiar’).

It suddenly started/began raining/to rain.  ‘De pronto empezó a llover.’

Con los cuatro últimos estarás acostumbrado a que la regla sea usar el gerundio. En realidad, la situación es compleja y poco importante. Algunas pistas: si dudas, usa el gerundio, pero nunca si se trata de would like, would, prefer, would love… Esto último es lo que sí que hay que tener en cuenta (claras situaciones concretas); por lo demás, simplificando, el infinitivo (algo más común en americano) solo se prefiere en casos de elección consciente concreta y similares:

I heard you talking and I didn’t like to disturb you, so I went away.
I hate to mention it, but you owe me some money.
‘Can I give you a lift?’  ‘No, thanks. I (would) prefer to walk.’


10) Verbo 1 más infinitivo con to o bien gerundio (con significado distinto)

Con estos pocos verbos muy comunes y otros pocos el significado cambia mucho según se use bien el gerundio o bien el infinitivo con to: remember, forget, regret, stop, go on, try.

En el caso de los cinco primeros, la diferencia está relacionada con el tiempo; el gerundio apunta al pasado, hacia atrás en el tiempo, mientras que el infinitivo apunta al futuro, o hacia adelante en el tiempo.

I remembered to correct him. [remember what one has/had to do]
‘Me acordé de corregirle.’
I remembered correcting him. [remember what one has/had done, or what
has/had happened]
‘Yo recordaba haberle corregido. ‘

She’s always forgetting to give me my letters.
‘Siempre se le está olvidando darme las cartas.’
I’ll never forget seeing the Queen.
‘Nunca se me olvidará el haber visto a la Reina.’

I regret to inform you that we are unable to offer you employment. [be
sorry for what one is going to say]
I don’t regret telling her what I thought, even if it upset her. [be sorry for
what one has done or has happened)

Stop y go on son mucho más comunes con gerundio. Fíjate en la diferencia de significado:

We stopped resting at that moment.  ‘Dejamos de descansar (…)’
‘We stopped to rest.  ‘Paramos para descansar.’ [the infinitive of purpose]

How long do you intend to go on playing those bloody records? [continue
with what one has been doing]
He welcomed the new students and then went on to explain the college
regulations. [change; move on to something new]

Try con infinitivo es algo más común e implica hacer un esfuerzo, probar a hacer algo difícil. Con gerundio es hacer un experimento, hacer algo para ver qué ocurrirá.

Please try to understand. ‘Haz el favor de intentar comprender.’
Try putting in some more vinegar - that might make it taste better.
‘Prueba añadiendo algo más de vinagre: eso podría hacer que supiera
mejor.’


EJERCICIO CON LA CLAVE. Traduce. Si te resulta difícil, lo cual es bien normal, repítelas una vez estudiadas las soluciones, o empieza por ir del inglés al español…

1. Le vi comprar la revista. 
2. Le oigo cantar todas las mañanas. 
3. El médico me ha prohibido fumar. 
4. Sus padres no le han dejado ir al campo. 
5. No quiero que te vayas sin verle. 
6. Dile a la niña que no chille tanto. 
7. Fue inútil buscarlo. 
8. Sigue probando.
9. He decidido dejar de fumar. 
10. Por favor, deja de interrumpirme. 
11. El domingo que viene empezaremos a decorar. 
12. Me encanta verte bailar. 
13. Es natural que ella quiera saberlo. 
14. Me pidió que la ayudara. 
15. Prefiero que la televisión no funcione.
16. No les importa esperar. 
17. Debemos evitar herirles. 
18. Es imposible que te oigan.
19. La máquina empezó a funcionar por sí sola. 
20. Recuerdo haber estado aquí.
21. Debes acordarte de cerrar la puerta con llave. 
22. No intentes engañarme. 
23. No quiero que te vistas así. 
24. Disfruto comiendo. 
25. No me hagas pensar ahora. 
26. Nuestro amigo nos ha aconsejado que leamos ese libro. 
27. No nos dejó movernos.
28. No podemos soportar oír ese ruido.
29. La policía tiene que seguir investigando. 
30. A veces olvidas devolverme el dinero. 
31. Lamento mucho interrumpiros, pero es urgente. 
32. Le escuché gritar.
33. No puede evitar criticarme.
34. Lamenta haberte hecho daño. 
35. No me autorizaron a marcharme. 
36. Me di cuenta de que se caía. 
37. Recuérdale a Antonia que la llame a su madre.

  
SOLUCIONES. (Nota que, por supuesto, hay otras correctas a veces.)
  
1) I saw him buy the magazine. 
2) I hear you singing every morning. 
3) The doctor has forbidden me to smoke. 
4) His parents haven’t let him go to the countryside.
5)  I don’t want you to leave without seeing him. 
6) Tell the little girl not to scream so much. 
7) It was no use looking for it. 
8) Keep on trying. 
9) I’ve decided to give up smoking. 
10) Please stop interrupting me. 
11) Next Sunday we’ll start to decorate / decorating. 
12) I love to see you dancing. 
13) It’s natural for her to want to know about it. 
14) She asked me to help her. 
15) I prefer the television not to work.
16) They don’t mind waiting.
17) We must avoid hurting them.
18) It’s impossible for them to hear you. 
19) The machine started to work / working by itself. 
20) I remember being here. 
21) You must remember to lock the door. 
22) Don’t try to cheat me. 
23) I don’t want you to dress like that. 
24) I enjoy eating. 
25) Don’t make me think now.
26) Our friend has advised us to read that book. 
27) She didn’t let us move.
28) We can’t stand hearing that noise.
29) The police have to go on investigating. 
30) You sometimes forget to give my money back. 
31) I very much regret to interrupt you, but it’s urgent. 
32) I listened to him shout.
33) He can’t help criticizing me. 
34) She regrets hurting you. 
35) They didn’t permit me to leave. 
36) I noticed him falling. 
37) Remind Antonia to phone her mother.



sábado, 7 de enero de 2012

OMISSION OF 'THE' IN GENERALIZATIONS

One of the grammar issues that students of English constantly get wrong is the omission or presence of the article the. In fact, the very usual mistake is using it when it has to be omitted (because ‘the’ really is the definite article, so if you mean people in general, you have to say ‘people’, not ‘the people’, which refers to definite, specific, particular people the addressee can identify). This therefore implies that one means to generalise but is actually talking about a specific, concrete case, which frequently creates misunderstandings.

There are three grammar categories of common nouns in English:

(a) singular count nouns (cup, woman);
(b) plural nouns (cups, women);
(c)  uncount nouns (love, sugar).

Plural nouns are of course countable, and uncountable nouns are necessarily singular.

You don’t usually have problems with the before nouns in group (a), but you normally do with the before the nouns in the other groups (because of the Spanish translation, which is often with the definite article, but whose rules are very different and really complicated).

When you use a noun of these two categories (b, c) in English, you omit the article the if you are making a generalization (cups in general, women in general; love as a concept, in the general sense; sugar as a product, sugar in general), and only use the if you are speaking about a definite, specific number (e.g. of women), or amount or instance (e.g. of love or sugar).

Thus, the important concept to understand is this: general or specific?
General: omit the!!
Specific: use the (as in Spanish).

Therefore, the is used in many cases, including when the noun is followed by a prepositional phrase - especially of - (the love of one’s children, the sugar in the bowl) or a relative clause (the love that you give me, the sugar you put in your coffee). But its NOT used when you say Love is important, All you need is love, Sugar is sweet or ‘I like sugar’. Normally (but not always), the mistake in these cases (the love, the sugar) takes place at the beginning of the sentence, because the subject in Spanish almost always has the definite article instead of no article: see the underlined sentences.

Study these other examples:

·      Some people think men are better at mathematics than women. I think they’re wrong.
·      The group consisted of three men and seven women. I only interviewed the men; the women are coming tomorrow.

·      Don’t you think people are sometimes too proud of themselves?
·      Tell the people they must get on the bus at once.

·      Doctors usually have illegible handwriting.
·      At the congress, the doctors were all American.

·      Not all languages are written.
·      Can you speak all the languages that she speaks?

·      Love, health and money are important for many people to achieve happiness.
·      Have you returned her the money? No? You should do it soon, since she needs those those thousand euros.

When you use an adjective (or more) before a noun and it is also a generalization, you still omit the article, even though the generalization is then partial:

·      He finds fair women attractive.
·      Naughty children don’t get Christmas presents.
·      I like modern art.
·      Brown cane sugar is better for the recipe, and I like it better.
BUT: Will you pass me the brown cane sugar in front of you? [that specific sugar]

Actually, there are just a few cases where both possibilities are correct (borderline cases in which the generalization is really/clearly restricted and partial). The second rule (which expands or is an extension of the basic one), in any case, is this:

If a noun phrase just includes real preposed adjectives (not some or your, for instance, which are determiners) a but it does not really refer to specific cases, omit the (I like foreign languages); but if it is followed by a relative clause (I like the foreign languages you speak) or prepositional phrase (I like the languages in this country), do use it if you do not know whether to use it or not, even if it is somehow a generalization and it is sometimes not the better option: I like people with good manners is actually a generalization (=I like well-mannered people) and is the right option. In short, there is a small percentage of dubious cases (very few or none for a native, actually!).

A particular case is when you refer to all the people of a country, you can choose between two typical possibilities: Dutch people or the Dutch; French people or the French; Spanish people or the Spaniards; American people or the Americans.

Of course, there are more cases of the presence or absence of the definite article apart from the ones we have dealt with (e.g. play the guitar; I like basketball).


 EXERCISE

Fill in the gaps with the article the or use a dash (-) to indicate it is cannot be used.
Example:

     -   water is now in short supply. Just use    the    water you really need.

1)        She’s already wrapped up all .............. presents.
2)        I usually find ..............  white wine sweeter than ..............  red wine.
3)        She’s specialised in .............. brain diseases.
4)        .............. art of Picasso and these other masters changed .............. history of .............. art.
5)        .............. water freezes at 0º Celsius.
6)        Did .............. Poles fight .............. Russians at that war?
7)        .............. Spanish women were less liberated than .............. ones in those countries.
8)        Don’t take .............. glasses out of the cupboard. There are enough of them here.
9)        You must do all .............. exercises now.
10)    He seems to like all .............. sports.
11)    I have employed all .............. letters in the alphabet.
12)    Some of .............. players are still not ready for such an important match.
13)    .............. children’s psychology is quite different to .............. grown-ups’. Everyone knows that.
14)    Yes, I’m interested in .............. computers, but not in .............. computers you are showing me.
15)    I don’t think I’ve got a good memory. There are three things I always forget: ..............  names, ..............  faces and - I don’t remember the third.
16)     I like .............. beer, but not .............. warm beer, so I won’t drink this.
17)    .............. Italians are usually fond of football, but of course many don’t like it.
18)    Don’t put all .............. eggs in just one basket.
19)    Have you read .............. morning papers.
20)    Nowadays .............. Spanish families aren’t as large as they used to be.


ANSWERS


1)     the
2)    --  / -- 
3)   -- 
4)     The / the / -- 
5)     -- 
6)     the / the
7)       --  / the
8)     the
9)     the
10)  --
11)  the
12)  the
13)  --  /  -- 
[the psychology of children > children’s psychology – the article of the second element (the psychology) is omitted in the noun phrase containing the genitive case; the other possibility (the children’s psychology) would refer to some specific children]
14)    --  / the
15)  --  --
16)  --  --
17)  The
18)  the
19)  the
20)  --

FREQUENT WRITING AND SPEAKING MISTAKES (2)

This second part basically focuses on grammar issues, including 'grammar words and phrases'.


1) THE DEFINITE ARTICLE (THE) WHEN GENERALISING


For this very common mistake, which affects communication, see "Omission of 'the' is generalizations" in this blog. An exercise - and its key - is provided. One of its labels is "grammar", of course.


2)     FOR, TO, FOR TO?


For this one, see "PURPOSE: FOR + NOUN PHRASE, (IN ORDER) TO + INFINITIVE CLAUSE, ETC."


3) ‘DURANTE’: FOR / DURING. OTHER RELATED PREPOSITIONS. AGO. PAST SIMPLE VS PRESENT PERFECT

Typical mistake:         * My father was in hospital during six weeks.

During is used to say when something happens; for is used to say how long it takes. So, curiously, it is for that expresses duration. Any tense is possible in both cases, depending on the idea we want to express.

There was a storm during the night: it rained for three or four hours.
My father was in hospital for six weeks during the summer.

Durante is the word in both cases, but this clue may help you as well: when English uses for, we can say durante, but we can also leave out this preposition:

'Estuve alojado en este hotel (durante) tres días' - I stayed in this hotel for three days.

During is usually the same as in, but there are sometimes differences. For example, they are not interchangeable in the following sentences:

We usually go on holiday in July, but last year we went in September. [exactly when]
He had some amazing experiences during his military service.
   [an activity, rather than a period of time]

The most difficult use of for for Spaniards is in connection with the perfect tenses. Here, we use very different structures to refer to an action or state that started in the past and continues up to the present (Present Perfect in English), or one that had started at a previous time in the past and still continued later at a certain time in the past (Past Perfect in English). If we express the starting point rather than the duration, since, not for, is used.

I’ve been here for two hours / since 11.

Llevo aquí dos horas / desde las once.
Hace dos horas que estoy aquí.
Estoy/Llevo aquí desde hace dos horas /desde las once.
(...)

I’ve been waiting for your call for a week / since last Tuesday.

Llevo esperando tu llamada (desde hace) una semana / desde el martes.
Espero / Estoy esperando tu llamada (desde) hace una semana /desde el martes.
Hace una semana que espero / estoy esperando tu llamada.
(...)

When we got home, she’d been playing video games for eight hours / since midday!

Cuando llegamos a casa, llevaba jugando con videojuegos (desde hacía) ocho horas / hacía ocho horas que estaba/llevaba jugando... / llevaba jugando con videojuegos desde las doce. (etc)

The thing is, Spanish is making increasing use of the English structure these days because of so many literal translations on the media, in books and so on. Thus, paradoxically, we end up using the English structure when speaking Spanish and the Spanish structures when speaking English (the latter being completely wrong). An example of the English structure in Spanish is:

Los Masai han vivido en ese territorio durante más de tres décadas.
(This used to mean that they do not live there any longer, but now one simply does not know.)

Don’t confuse for and ago. They are quite different. The only reason why students sometimes confuse them is, again, Spanish (the word hace, actually - so it is ususlly confused only with perfect tenses). Ago clearly says when an action took place. I has nothing to do with duration (how long). It is only used with the Simple Past. The phrase with ago ‘measures’ time from the present to the past.

Compare:

Hace dos meses que nos vimos. (= Nos vimos hace dos meses.)
We saw each other two months ago.

Hace dos meses que nos vemos. (= Nos vemos desde hace dos meses, Llevámos viéndonos desde hace dos meses, Llevámos viéndonos dos meses, etc.)
We’ve been seeing each other for two months. [See is not normally used in the progressive tenses, but this is one of the cases in which it is - it means ‘meet’ and does not really refer to having the sense of sight.]

More examples with ago and for:

It is now 9 p.m. and I finished work at 6 p.m., so I finished three hours ago. I’ve been reading (for) all this time. [This is one of the few expressions in which for is usually omitted, as in (For) how long?]

bought my house a long time ago - in 1983, I think. I had to pay the bank for twenty years, but now the house is legally mine.

4)     AS / LIKE / SUCH AS / THE WAY / HOW

Typical mistakes:        * It is exported to countries as Germany and Poland.
* He can’t speak English as you.
                                      * He was talking to his employees like a boss.
                                     * Do it how the others have done it.
* He saw how she was crying.

One or two correct alternatives for each of the previous sentences:

It is exported to such countries as Germany and Poland.
He can’t speak English as you do / like you.
                                      He was talking to his employees as a boss.
                                      Do it the way the others have done it.
He saw her crying / He noticed she was crying.

Como has a great deal of meanings and is rendered in many different ways in English. We are not dealing here with all its translations (e.g. when como is conditional, as in “Como te muevas, te la cargas”).

As is used to talk about the job, function, use or role of a person or thing.

I used to work as a taxi driver.
(Like here would suggest a comparison with a taxi driver, not an identity.)

She went to the party dressed as a traffic-warden.
As a lawyer, he advised him not to take the old lady to court.
I’m talking to you as a colleague rather than as a father.

When we want to say that people, things, actions or situations are similar to each other, we can use as or like, depending on the grammar of the sentence.

Like is a preposition - it is followed by a noun or pronoun.

I’m very like my brother.     My sister isn’t much like me.

As is a conjunction - it is followed by a clause, with a subject and verb.

I’m no orator, as Brutus is. (Mark Antony in Julius Caesar)
She’s a fine singer, as her mother used to be.

As is also used before prepositional expressions.

In 1939, as in 1914, there was a great surge or patriotic feeling.

In an informal style, especially in American English, like is very often used as a conjunction instead of as.

Nobody loves you like I do, baby.

Like is also often used, informally, instead of as if, as though.

She sat there eating cream cakes like there was no tomorrow. (como si)

Another use of as is in expressions like as you know, as we agreed, as you suggested. The meaning here is not really ‘comparison’ or ‘similarity’, but ‘identity’. (As you know does not mean ‘You know something like this’; it simply means ‘You know this’.) In an informal style, like is possible in some of these expressions, but it is unusual in educated English.

We can use such as and, more informally, the very common like to exemplify. Try to use the latter only in speech; the former and including are very good options in writing.

She likes dangerous sports like bungee jumping, mountaineering and boxing.
She likes such dangerous sports as bungee jumping, mountaineering and boxing.
She likes dangerous sports such as bungee jumping, mountaineering and boxing.
She likes dangerous sports, including bungee jumping, mountaineering and boxing.

Way (meaning ‘method’) is often used without a preposition.

    Do it any way you like. (Hazlo como quieras - ‘de cualquier forma que quieras’)


When it is followed by a relative clause, that (or no pronoun) is much more common than in which. The idea can be translated as el modo en que, la manera en que... and, usually, como.
   
I liked the way (that) she organized the meeting.
The way (that) you’re doing it is completely crazy.

With perceptive verbs (watch, notice, hear...), Spanish sometimes makes use of como while English prefers other kinds of subordinate clauses, especially an infinitive preceded by its subject.

Vio como [rather than cómo] el animal pasó por encima de la niña.
= Vio al animal pasar por encima de la niña.

He saw the animal walk over the child.

La vi como / que cruzaba la calle. = La vi cruzando la calle.
I saw her crossing the street.

How is only used in questions - direct or indirect - and exclamations. In the former case, cómo (not como) is the Spanish typical equivalent, whereas in the latter, another stressed word is used in Spanish: qué.

How did you do it?     Tell me how you did it.   I’d like to know how you did it.
How are you?            He asked me how I was.   He wanted to know how I was.

How beautiful!          How marvellous the trees are!
How well she plays!    How she’s grown!

Notice that there is a related kind of how-clause in which former Spanish used cuán and contemporary Spanish uses lo ... que ... , qué or (rarely) cómo de ...

It’s incredible how well you dance.           -    Es increíble lo bien que bailas.
I don’t know how old this book is.             -   No sé cómo de viejo es este libro.
I can perfectly see how good you are.       -    Veo perfectamente qué bueno eres.
I don’t know how often she goes swimming.-   No sé con qué frecuencia va a la             
                                                                                                              piscina.


5)     COULD / WAS ABLE TO / MANAGED TO / SUCCEEDED IN




Probably, the one difficult thing about can/could that you need to know is this: could can be used for the past, of course, when it means a general ability and similar things in the past (this is the most common verb form for this usage), but not for onespecific occasion. When you are talking about one thing that you were able to do - often despite difficulties and/or with effort - you must use was/were able to / managed to / succeeded in. Look:

       
               a) I could swim / I was able to swim at a very early age. [past ability]

               b) (After many unsuccessful attempts,) we were able to persuade her /     
                   we managed to persuade her / we succeeded in persuading her. [one 
                   specific occasion, an achievement, a specific successful occasion ...]

In Spanish, (a) can be 'podía, sabía', whereas (b) can be 'logró, consiguió, pudo'. The 'only' problem is that, on Spanish TV, you also very often hear 'pudo marcar' when the idea is 'podía haber marcado (pero no lo hizo)': might/could have scored. But when 'pudo marcar' is really 'pudo marcar' (= 'lo consiguió'), then you render it like this in English:  managed to score (and the other structures), but not *could score.

Easier: couldn't is for both cases, so the following sentences are both correct:

a) I couldn't speak / wasn't able to speak any English four years ago. (past ability)

b) I couldn't find / wasn't able to find the English word for that at that moment, although I had    
     it on the tip of my tongue. (specific occasion)


6)     SINGULAR OR PLURAL? COUNTABLE OR UNCOUNTABLE? 

  • people

People is the usual plural of person, and has therefore plural agreement with the verb (people are, people were, people have, people don’t say, etc), as well as being referred back with the pronouns (or referential words) they, them, their, theirs, themselves.

Remember Barbra Streisand? She used to sing ‘People – people who need people …’ Not *‘People – people who needs people …’

Typical mistakes:
*The people in Berlin was very friendly. When you talked to her, she always spoke English to you and tried to be helpful.

Correct version:
The people in Berlin were very friendly. When you talk to them, they always spoke English to you and tried to be helpful.

  • police

 Exactly what has been stated about people is also true about the word police.

Look at the correct usage:

The police don’t have any clues yet. They seem to be puzzled by this new serial killer in the area.

If you need to refer to one person belonging to the police, use police officer, or – less common nowadays – policeman/policewoman. Of course these words have another kind of plural, and you can say, for instance, the two police officers – or the two policemen/policewomen.


  • all kinds of

Another Spanish interference.

Correct: I like all kinds of sports.
Incorrect: *I like all kind of sports.


  • Some uncountable nouns which cause problems

 Advice, news, and furniture are probably the nouns most frequently mistaken in this respect, one of the reasons for the high frequency of its misuse being – apart from the fact that their typical Spanish translations are countable (e.g. in un consejo, una noticia, muchos muebles) – that they are precisely very frequent English words. So, instead of the idea of ‘consejo / noticias / mueble’, you cam always think of ‘asesoramiento / información nueva / mobiliario’.

All three are uncount nouns; therefore, they have no plural form, cannot be used with one or a(n), and can, instead, take some, any, no, much, (a) little … As they are singular, you can’t use many, several, these or any other plural words. And the verb agrees in the singular, of course. Because of its final s, news is especially confusing!

Typical mistakes:

       *Would you like me to give you an advice?
       *The news are really horrible.
       * Please take all these furnitures out of the room, will you?

Correct versions:

       Would you like me to give you some advice?
       The news is really horrible.
       Please take all this furniture out of the room, will you?

If you really want to refer to one or any other number of specific items, use a piece of (even in the plural, of course). Examples:

       You’ve given me two good pieces of advice concerning my marriage!
       Anyway, no news is good news. Mmm – actually, he has told me one important piece 
       of news: he’s getting married!
       This gorgeous chest of drawers is the single piece of furniture I want to keep.